Skip to content

Only use layout_for_ptr feature for zerocopy tests#3364

Closed
erickt wants to merge 1 commit into
google:mainfrom
erickt:layout-for-ptr
Closed

Only use layout_for_ptr feature for zerocopy tests#3364
erickt wants to merge 1 commit into
google:mainfrom
erickt:layout-for-ptr

Conversation

@erickt
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@erickt erickt commented May 13, 2026

This puts the use of the unstable feature layout_for_ptr behind all(test, miri), since it is only necessary for zerocopy tests, not for downstream users.

This puts the use of the unstable feature `layout_for_ptr` behind
`all(test, miri)`, since it is only necessary for zerocopy tests, not
for downstream users.
@codecov-commenter
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 91.88%. Comparing base (be6f199) to head (fab4760).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #3364   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.88%   91.88%           
=======================================
  Files          20       20           
  Lines        6076     6076           
=======================================
  Hits         5583     5583           
  Misses        493      493           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@erickt
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

erickt commented May 13, 2026

The anneal test failures seem to be some unrelated docker issue as far as I can tell.

@joshlf
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

joshlf commented May 13, 2026

Superseded by #3365 to work around Docker registry permissions issues

@joshlf joshlf closed this May 13, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants